Entity: state courts
📊 Facts Database / Entities / state courts

state courts

14 Facts
15 Related Topics
State courts can review and, in some cases, reject legislative-drawn congressional or legislative district maps for violating state redistricting standards and order remedial maps or compliance with those standards.
N/A high legal
Judicial enforcement mechanism for state redistricting rules and voter-approved standards.
State and federal courts have the legal authority to temporarily block or enjoin National Guard deployments when judges determine those deployments exceed executive authority or are unlawful.
November 19, 2025 high legal
Judicial injunctions and stays can pause military or Guard operations pending legal review of executive actions.
U.S. federal and state judges have asserted that military involvement in civilian affairs is legally fraught and can threaten constitutional liberties, leading courts to scrutinize or block domestic deployments of military forces.
November 19, 2025 high temporal
Describes a recurring legal principle and judicial posture regarding use of military forces in domestic situations.
State constitutions can condition governors' authority to deploy state National Guard forces on specific circumstances such as 'rebellion' or 'invasion', and courts have interpreted those constitutional provisions as imposing limits on gubernatorial deployment power.
November 19, 2025 high temporal
States may have constitutional criteria that restrict when governors can activate the National Guard for domestic operations.
A judicial interpretation can conclude that a governor's authority as commander-in-chief of a state's National Guard is not unfettered by state law.
November 17, 2025 high legal
General legal principle that courts may find statutory limits on gubernatorial command of the National Guard.
State criminal convictions and sentences can remain in effect independently of related federal convictions, so a person can continue serving a state-imposed prison term even if a federal conviction is overturned.
November 14, 2025 high legal
State and federal prosecutions operate separately under the dual-sovereignty principle.
Courts have the authority to invalidate local election measures that conflict with state election law.
November 03, 2025 high legal
General legal principle of state law supremacy in election administration.
Redistricting plans are commonly subject to judicial review, legal challenges, and voter referendum or initiative processes, any of which can delay, modify, or block implementation of new maps.
October 13, 2025 high legal
Court cases and ballot procedures are standard mechanisms through which enacted redistricting maps are contested or overturned.
State courts make the factual findings for SIJS by determining that a child or youth has been abused, neglected, or abandoned by a parent, which is the basis for the SIJS designation.
January 01, 1990 high temporal
Procedural role of state courts in establishing eligibility for SIJS.
Courts can disqualify a district attorney from prosecuting a case on the basis of an appearance of impropriety arising from a personal or romantic relationship with a prosecutor or special prosecutor.
high legal-ethics
Judicial disqualification standards intended to preserve impartiality and avoid conflicts of interest or appearances of impropriety.
In the U.S., murder prosecutions are typically brought in state courts, but federal law also permits charging a homicide under federal statutes when the killing involves a firearm used in furtherance of another crime of violence; federal homicide charges can carry the death penalty even if the relevant state does not authorize capital punishment.
high legal
Jurisdictional and sentencing rules for homicide prosecutions under U.S. federal and state law.
State courts, including state supreme courts, have authority to suspend an attorney's law license pending disciplinary proceedings or investigations.
high legal
Attorney licensing and disciplinary actions are typically administered at the state level and can include temporary suspensions while allegations are resolved.
A request to transfer a criminal prosecution from state court to federal court typically must be made within 30 days of the defendant's arraignment unless a court finds 'good cause' to allow a later filing.
high procedural
Describes a common procedural time limit and its exception for motions changing jurisdiction in criminal cases.
In the United States, individuals can be prosecuted and convicted in both state courts and federal courts for related criminal conduct, resulting in separate convictions and sentences (for example, a state murder conviction and a federal hate crime conviction).
high legal
Separate state and federal prosecutions may apply under the U.S. dual-sovereignty framework.