Army Study Warned Of Intense Pain From Shock Gloves ICE Is Buying
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement signed a $16.7 million contract in August 2026 to buy 6,000 pairs of stun-producing "shock gloves" for use by its officers.[1]
The purchase comes despite an Army study that found the gloves cause intense pain and immediately stop a subject's resistance.[1] ICE described the devices in procurement records as non-lethal "distraction and de-escalation devices." CBS News
In October 2024, an Army exercise at Fort Leavenworth tested the gloves on role-playing combative prisoners and concluded they produced intense pain and immediate cessation of resistance.[1] Participants reported fatigue, soreness and a heightened fear of being shocked again, and some said merely seeing the gloves afterward prompted compliance.[1]
The Army study and ICE's awareness of its findings were disclosed after the agency released documents to watchdog group American Oversight as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.[1] The glove manufacturer also warns the devices should not be used on high-risk groups such as children, pregnant people or disabled individuals.[1]
Show source details & analysis (1 source)
📌 Key Facts
- In October 2024, an Army exercise at Fort Leavenworth tested shock gloves on role-playing combative prisoners and found they caused intense pain and immediate cessation of resistance.
- Participants reported fatigue, soreness and heightened fear of being shocked again, and some said merely seeing the gloves afterward prompted compliance.
- ICE signed a $16.7 million contract in August 2026 to purchase 6,000 pairs of the gloves and described them in procurement records as non-lethal "distraction and de-escalation devices."
- The Army study and ICE's awareness of its findings were disclosed after ICE released documents to American Oversight as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
- The glove manufacturer warns the devices should not be used on high-risk populations such as children, pregnant women or disabled individuals.
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time