Back to all stories
Police uniforms and misc. items from the German occupation of Norway during World War II 1940 – 1945, on display in the exhibitions of Norwegian National Museum of Justice in Trondheim, Norway (Norwegian: Justismuseet (i det tidligere Kriminalasylet). Photo taken in April 2019.
National flag and mar
Photo: Wolfmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Wikimedia Commons

Queens Jury Conviction in NYPD Detective Jonathan Diller Killing Draws Criticism From Former Sergeant and Legal Analyst

A Queens jury convicted Guy Rivera of manslaughter in the killing of NYPD Detective Jonathan Diller but acquitted him of first-degree murder, prompting former NYPD Sgt. Joseph Imperatrice to say the panel "absolutely missed the mark" and argue that bringing an illegal gun and firing at uniformed officers showed clear intent deserving the death penalty. Fox News legal analyst Josh Ritter called the verdict "inconsistent," noting jurors found specific intent to kill a second officer (attempted first-degree murder) but not for the officer who died—suggesting a possible misunderstanding of the law on intent—while Imperatrice framed the outcome as part of broader police frustration with repeat offenders and "nonsense laws."

Crime and Policing Courts and Criminal Justice Policing and Criminal Justice New York Crime and Courts

📌 Key Facts

  • A Queens jury rejected a first-degree murder conviction for Guy Rivera in the killing of NYPD Detective Jonathan Diller, according to Fox News (April 2, 2026).
  • The jury found specific intent to kill a second officer (attempted first-degree murder) but not first-degree murder for the officer who died; Fox News legal analyst and criminal defense attorney Josh Ritter called that outcome 'inconsistent' and suggested the jurors may have misunderstood the law on intent.
  • Former NYPD Sgt. Joseph Imperatrice publicly said the jury 'absolutely missed the mark' in rejecting the first-degree murder charge.
  • Imperatrice argued that Rivera bringing an illegal gun to the scene and firing at uniformed officers demonstrated clear intent, and he said killing a police officer should carry the death penalty.
  • Imperatrice framed the verdict as reflecting broader police frustrations with repeat offenders who have long 'rap sheets' and with what he called 'nonsense laws' that undermine officer safety and accountability.
  • All of the above criticisms and commentary were reported by Fox News on April 2, 2026.

📊 Relevant Data

In 2023, of the 57 known offenders involved in felonious killings of law enforcement officers in the United States, 28 were White, 8 were Black, and the race of 21 was not reported.

FBI Releases Officers Killed and Assaulted in the Line of Duty, 2023 Special Report and Law Enforcement Employee Counts — Federal Bureau of Investigation

In New York City in 2021, Black people were jailed at a rate 11.6 times higher than White people, an increase from 4.8 times in 2016, driven largely by rising pretrial disparities.

Racial Disparities in the Use of Jail Across New York City, 2016-2021 — Data Collaborative for Justice

📰 Source Timeline (2)

Follow how coverage of this story developed over time

April 02, 2026
2:07 PM
Ex-NYPD sergeant says jury 'absolutely missed the mark' after cop killer dodges murder charge
Fox News
New information:
  • Former NYPD Sgt. Joseph Imperatrice publicly said the jury 'absolutely missed the mark' by rejecting a first-degree murder conviction for Guy Rivera.
  • Imperatrice argued that bringing an illegal gun to the scene and firing at uniformed officers showed clear intent and said killing a police officer should carry the death penalty.
  • Fox News legal analyst and criminal defense attorney Josh Ritter called the verdict 'inconsistent,' noting the jury found specific intent to kill a second officer (attempted first-degree murder) but not first-degree murder for the officer who died, and suggested the jury may have misunderstood the law on intent.
  • Imperatrice framed the verdict as part of broader frustrations among police about repeat offenders with long 'rap sheets' and 'nonsense laws' that they believe undermine officer safety and accountability.