Section 2 of the U.S. Voting Rights Act prohibits racial discrimination in the drawing of political districts (redistricting).
November 18, 2025
high
temporal
Legal protection against racial discrimination in the mapmaking process for electoral districts under federal law.
The Voting Rights Act has been a key federal tool used to help root out racial discrimination in voting for more than a half century.
October 16, 2025
high
legal
Describes the historical role of the Voting Rights Act in addressing racial discrimination in voting.
A 2025 report by Black Voters Matter Fund and Fair Fight Action estimated that overturning Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act could allow Republican-controlled states to redraw at least 19 additional U.S. House districts in ways that favor Republicans.
October 15, 2025
high
statistical
The estimate quantifies potential partisan seat changes tied to the removal of Section 2 redistricting requirements.
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act has been interpreted to require the drawing of legislative districts that give racial or language-minority groups an opportunity to elect representatives of their choice.
October 15, 2025
high
legal
Section 2 is a provision of the federal Voting Rights Act used in litigation and redistricting to protect minority voting power.
The U.S. Supreme Court's term beginning in October 2025 includes cases addressing the constitutional scope of presidential power, challenges related to the Voting Rights Act, and legal disputes over presidential tariff authority.
October 06, 2025
high
temporal
Overview of major issue areas on the Supreme Court's docket at the start of the October 2025 term.
Federal courts have the authority to enjoin state congressional maps and to order states to redraw district maps when the maps are found to violate federal law, including the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution.
March 24, 2025
high
procedural
When courts find a map unlawful, they can block its use and require the state to adopt a remedial map or have a court-ordered map implemented.
In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling finding a likely violation of the Voting Rights Act in a case concerning Alabama's congressional map.
January 01, 2023
high
legal-temporal
A Supreme Court ruling applying the Voting Rights Act to a congressional redistricting map.
In 2013 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Voting Rights Act's coverage formula for Section 5 preclearance was unconstitutional, effectively ending the requirement that jurisdictions with a history of discrimination obtain federal approval before making certain election-related changes.
June 25, 2013
high
legal
Summary of the Supreme Court's 2013 decision that invalidated the statutory coverage formula that triggered Section 5 preclearance obligations.
In 2013 the U.S. Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder invalidated Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, removing the coverage formula that determined which jurisdictions required federal 'preclearance' before changing voting laws.
June 25, 2013
high
legal
Significant Supreme Court decision that changed enforcement of the Voting Rights Act
Since 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued decisions that have significantly weakened enforcement mechanisms of the Voting Rights Act.
January 01, 2013
high
temporal
General trend in Supreme Court rulings affecting the implementation of the Voting Rights Act beginning in 2013.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted on 1965-08-06 to protect racial minorities' voting rights.
August 06, 1965
high
temporal
Federal civil rights law establishing protections against racial discrimination in voting.
The Voting Rights Act provides a legal basis for minority voters to challenge electoral maps that dilute their voting influence.
August 06, 1965
high
temporal
Legal framework used in litigation over redistricting and alleged vote dilution.
The Voting Rights Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on August 6, 1965.
August 06, 1965
high
historical
Enactment of major federal voting-rights legislation.
The Voting Rights Act includes provisions intended to prevent dilution of minority voting power, including protections related to how electoral district maps are drawn.
August 06, 1965
high
legal
Federal law aimed at protecting minority electoral influence against discriminatory practices
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits voting practices, including aspects of redistricting, that result in the denial or abridgement of the right to vote on account of race, such as dilution of minority voting strength.
August 06, 1965
high
legal
Federal statutory standard used to challenge voting maps alleged to diminish minority electoral influence
The Voting Rights Act is a landmark U.S. federal law enacted on August 6, 1965, that prohibits racial discrimination in voting and provides federal enforcement measures to protect voting rights.
August 06, 1965
high
temporal
Basic description of the Voting Rights Act and its purpose.
The Voting Rights Act includes a provision that addresses redistricting to prevent dilution of minority voting power when drawing congressional district lines.
August 06, 1965
high
temporal
Description of a core substantive provision of the Voting Rights Act related to redistricting and minority representation.
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act provides a mechanism for addressing current-day manifestations of past and present decisions that disadvantaged racial or ethnic minorities in access to the voting system.
August 06, 1965
high
legal
Summarizes the remedial purpose of Section 2 in addressing discriminatory effects on minority voters.
Federal election monitors have observed polling places in the United States since the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.
August 06, 1965
high
temporal
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 established federal protections against discriminatory voting practices and enabled federal oversight of elections.
Racial gerrymandering, which involves drawing electoral district lines to intentionally target or dilute the voting power of racial minority groups, violates the federal Voting Rights Act.
August 06, 1965
high
legal
Legal principle governing redistricting and minority voting rights under U.S. federal law.
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires challengers to demonstrate current racially polarized voting and that minority populations are unable to elect candidates of their choice, among other factors.
high
legal
Legal standard for bringing challenges under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act provides a legal basis to challenge voting practices and electoral maps that dilute minority voting strength and is used to ensure minority voters have the opportunity to elect their preferred candidates.
high
legal
Describes the purpose and common use of Section 2 in litigation over alleged vote dilution.