Election Law and Ballot Access

The U.S. Supreme Court on April 9, 2026, declined an emergency request by Samuel Ronan to be reinstated on the Republican primary ballot in Ohio’s 15th Congressional District after state officials removed him for allegedly misrepresenting himself as a Republican. Ronan, a former Democratic National Committee chair candidate who sought to challenge GOP Rep. Mike Carey, had been certified by the Franklin County Board of Elections before a Republican voter objected and Secretary of State Frank LaRose cast the tie‑breaking vote to disqualify him. U.S. District Judge Sarah Morrison, a Trump appointee, and later a three‑judge appeals panel of GOP appointees upheld the state’s decision, finding Ohio’s interest in policing party‑label integrity outweighed what Morrison called a minimal burden on Ronan’s First Amendment rights, and rejecting his argument that he had not lied about his affiliation. The Supreme Court, acting on its shadow docket with no noted dissents or explanation, left those rulings in place, effectively locking Ronan off the GOP ballot and prompting his warning that the decision could chill candidates’ political speech if party officials can brand them dishonest and bar them from primaries. The case highlights how state election officials and courts are drawing lines around who qualifies as a genuine party member, and underscores the high court’s ongoing willingness to leave contentious ballot‑access disputes to the states without full briefing or argument.