Mainstream coverage this week focused on two developments: a Phase 3 trial of pridopidine has begun enrolling people with ALS to test whether it slows progression, and Columbia University clinicians reported promising early results from an experimental antisenseâstyle, intrathecal therapy targeting a rare FUS mutation â including one preâsymptomatic carrier whose EMG abnormalities normalized and who remains symptomâfree three years into treatment â and the expansion of Columbiaâs Silence ALS program to develop individualized geneâbased therapies.
Missing from much of the reporting were important context and equity concerns: FUS mutations are relatively rare (about 3.2% of familial ALS and second only to SOD1 among known genes), so the Columbia case may not generalize to most ALS patients; longâterm safety, durability and access to intrathecal gene therapies remain unclear. Independent sources also highlight chronic underârepresentation of nonâWhite patients in U.S. ALS trials (historically ~95% Caucasian participants), earlier age at diagnosis among Black patients (â26% diagnosed before 50 vs 12.9% of White patients), differences in prevalence by race (U.S. prevalence ~5.0 per 100,000 in Whites vs 3.4 in Black individuals), and a high estimated heritability for sporadic ALS (~61%), all of which bear on who benefits from new treatments and how trial results should be interpreted. No strong contrarian viewpoints were identified in the materials reviewed.