Florida Appeals Court Strikes Down Concealed-Carry Age Limit For 18- To 20-Year-Olds
Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal struck down Florida's ban on concealed carry for 18- to 20-year-olds on June 17, 2026, ruling the age restriction unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.[1]
The ruling came in the appeal of Jaylen Eubanks, who was arrested in Broward County in 2024 at age 18 and charged with carrying a concealed firearm and improper exhibition.[1] The three-judge panel said Florida failed to identify a historical tradition justifying an age-based ban and cited Supreme Court cases Heller, Bruen and Rahimi.[1] The judges pointed to founding-era militia laws that required many 18-year-old men to serve armed as evidence that young adults were expected to keep and bear arms.[1] Attorney General James Uthmeier said the state will not seek further review and will work with the agriculture department to implement the order.[1]
In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen adopted the history-and-tradition test used in this appeal. Florida enacted permitless concealed carry effective July 1, 2023, but it kept a statute requiring concealed-weapons license applicants to be at least 21 years old. Eubanks was arrested on May 23, 2024, and a trial court initially upheld the age limit while other Broward judges reached conflicting results in 2025.
Supporters called the decision a victory for treating 18- to 20-year-olds as full adults for gun rights, noting parallels to voting and military service. Some observers said the ruling may have limited practical effect because Florida already allows permitless carry in most public places, though it will matter in cases involving restricted locations and affirmative defenses.
The mainstream summary frames the ruling primarily as a straightforward application of Second Amendment rights, but it does not delve into the broader implications of the decision as highlighted by social media commentators. For instance, @AdrianNormanDC emphasized that the ruling signifies a major victory for Second Amendment rights, arguing that the Constitution should not treat 18- to 20-year-olds as second-class citizens regarding concealed carry. This perspective adds a layer of cultural significance to the ruling, suggesting it aligns with a growing recognition of young adults' rights across various domains, including voting and military service, which @BK_McCallum pointed out as inconsistent with the previous age ban. Additionally, while the summary notes the limited practical effect of the ruling due to existing permitless carry laws, @regularguyguns underscores that the ruling remains crucial for specific legal contexts, such as affirmative defenses in restricted areas like school zones.
Moreover, the summary does not mention the structural implications of the Bruen decision, which Duke University law professor Jacob D. Charles argues marks a shift towards evaluating gun regulations based on historical traditions rather than contemporary interests. This shift is critical as it sets a precedent for lower courts to challenge modern restrictions lacking historical analogues, such as age limits for concealed carry, which the mainstream account overlooks. The broader context of this legal evolution suggests that the ruling could have far-reaching consequences beyond Florida, potentially influencing similar cases across the nation.[2]
Show source details & analysis (1 source)
📌 Key Facts
- On June 17, 2026, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal held the concealed-carry ban for 18- to 20-year-olds unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.
- The ruling came in the appeal of Jaylen Eubanks, arrested in 2024 at age 18 and charged with carrying a concealed firearm and improper exhibition.
- Attorney General James Uthmeier announced the state will not seek further review and will work with the agriculture department to implement the order.
- The panel cited Supreme Court cases Heller, Bruen and Rahimi and said Florida failed to identify a historical tradition justifying such an age restriction.
- Judges pointed to founding-era militia laws requiring many 18-year-old men to serve while armed as evidence young adults were expected to keep and bear arms.
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time