Judge Says She Lacks Authority To Reinstate Yosemite Ranger Fired Over Flag
U.S. District Judge Jennifer Thurston ruled she lacks authority to reinstate former Yosemite ranger Shannon "SJ" Joslin and dismissed Joslin's lawsuit on Friday, June 12, 2026.[1]
Thurston granted the federal government's motion to dismiss and denied a preliminary injunction that would have returned Joslin to duty and barred a possible criminal probe.[1] The court said federal personnel laws and legal precedent prevent it from deciding whether the firing was unconstitutional or from blocking a hypothetical criminal case.[1] The Interior Department defended the Park Service's actions, citing rules that require permits and designate specific First Amendment areas to protect park resources and visitor experience.[1]
On May 20, 2025, Joslin, then an off-duty Yosemite ranger and biologist, helped climbers unfurl a 55-foot-by-35-foot transgender pride flag from El Capitan for about two hours.[1] The National Park Service fired Joslin in August 2025, saying she participated in an unpermitted demonstration outside designated areas.[1] Yosemite added a rule the day after the display that bars banners, flags or signs larger than 15 square feet in wilderness or potential wilderness areas unless a permit is issued.
Joslin sued the Interior Department and the National Park Service in February 2026, alleging selective enforcement and First Amendment retaliation.[1] The display and the firing drew divided reaction online, with some users praising the Park Service and others calling the dismissal a free-speech violation.
The mainstream summary does not mention that the National Park Service (NPS) regulations require permits for most demonstrations, including those involving groups of 25 or more, and that specific First Amendment areas are designated for such activities. This context is crucial as it highlights the legal framework within which Joslin's actions were evaluated, suggesting that her firing was not merely a punitive measure but rather a response to established regulations aimed at preserving park resources and visitor experiences. The summary also omits the fact that prior to Joslin's incident, multiple flags and banners had been displayed on El Capitan for protests, indicating a history of similar actions that were not sanctioned, which could suggest selective enforcement in the NPS's response to Joslin's display. This history could provide a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding the enforcement of park regulations and the potential implications for free speech rights in national parks.[2][3]
Show source details & analysis (1 source)
ð Relevant Data
NPS regulations require a permit for most demonstrations in national parks, including groups of 25 or more, and Yosemite designates specific First Amendment areas for such activities.
Special Use Permits - General Information and Guidelines â National Park Service
Yosemite added a rule the day after the May 2025 flag display prohibiting any banner, flag, or sign larger than 15 square feet in wilderness or potential wilderness areas unless authorized by permit.
Yosemite Bans Large Flags on El Cap and Other Walls â Climbing.com
Prior to the May 2025 incident, multiple flags and banners had been temporarily rigged on El Capitan for protests, including a 'Stop the Genocide' banner in 2024 and an upside-down U.S. flag in February 2025.
Yosemite Bans Large Flags on El Cap and Other Walls â Climbing.com
ð Key Facts
- On Friday, June 12, 2026, U.S. District Judge Jennifer Thurston ruled she lacks authority to reinstate former Yosemite ranger Shannon "SJ" Joslin.
- The judge granted the federal government's motion to dismiss Joslin's lawsuit and denied a preliminary injunction seeking reinstatement and protection from criminal investigation.
- Joslin was fired after helping to unfurl a 55-foot by 35-foot transgender pride flag across El Capitan for about two hours in May 2025 while off duty.
- The court held that, under existing federal personnel statutes and precedent, it cannot adjudicate whether the firing was unconstitutional or block a hypothetical criminal case.
- The Interior Department defended its actions, citing rules requiring permits and designated protest areas to protect park resources and visitor experience.
ð° Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time