Minnesota Senate moves to ban prediction markets
The Minnesota Senate approved a ban on betting-style prediction markets in a 56-10 vote on April 30, a move supporters say will curb gambling risks and critics warn could draw legal challenges. (fox9.com)
The measure passed after GOP leaders tried to block a procedural vote and is attached to a public safety bill with bipartisan House support. The legislation specifically targets platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi and comes alongside a separate Senate ban on online sweepstakes that resemble slot machines. Supporters including Sen. John Marty and Sen. Jordan Rasmusson cited risks of gambling addiction and potential corruption. Senate Minority Leader Johnson warned the Trump administration filed five lawsuits in April against states that tried similar bans and predicted Minnesota would face litigation if the bill becomes law.
The episode follows other states' efforts to restrict prediction markets and the Trump administration's filing of five lawsuits in April challenging those laws. Backers said the bill closes what they view as a legal loophole, while critics warned it could spark protracted court fights that will determine how the law is enforced.
Show source details & analysis (1 source)
📌 Key Facts
- The Minnesota Senate approved a ban on betting-style prediction markets in a 56–10 vote on April 30.
- The ban language has bipartisan support in the House and is currently attached to a public safety bill, but GOP leaders tried to block a vote on procedural grounds.
- The legislation specifically targets prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi and accompanies a separate Senate ban on online sweepstakes that resemble slot machines.
- Senate Minority Leader Johnson said the Trump administration has already filed five lawsuits in April against states that attempted similar bans and predicted Minnesota will face litigation if the bill passes.
- Supporters, including Sen. John Marty and Sen. Jordan Rasmusson, cite gambling addiction risks and potential corruption as reasons to close what they see as legal loopholes.
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time