Bessent Says Trump Tariffs Could Return by July Under Section 301 After IEEPA Ruling
Bessent said that tariffs put in place under the Trump administration, which appeared weakened after the Supreme Court’s recent IEEPA ruling, could be restored by July by shifting authority to Section 301 of the Trade Act. He framed the move as an administrative pivot to preserve tariff leverage and revenue after the court curtailed the use of IEEPA, with the timeline aimed at restoring full tariff levels within weeks rather than months and targeting unfair trade practices from major trading partners, including China.
That pivot matters because the tariffs have had measurable macroeconomic and distributional effects: Trump-era duties enacted in 2025 have raised roughly $214.7 billion in inflation-adjusted customs revenue above the 2022–2024 average as of April 2026, while analyses attribute a roughly 0.5 percentage-point drag on U.S. real GDP growth in 2025 to the April announcements alone. Section 301 probes, which are designed to address unfair practices such as structural excess capacity and overproduction, can also invite retaliatory measures; and the broader suite of tariff tools previously used—like permanent Section 232 measures—have been estimated to shave about 0.2 percent off long-run U.S. GDP even before any retaliation, while producing winners (some manufacturing sectors) and losers (consumers and importers).
Public reaction has been mixed and highlights the stakes for markets and policymakers. Some observers on social media argued the Supreme Court setback simply pushed the administration toward more durable authorities, urging markets to treat the duties as effectively permanent and warning that a brief “tariff-free” window could be mispriced. Others cautioned that Section 301 timelines and legal requirements may make a rapid July restoration optimistic, while supporters said alternative authorities would keep tariff revenues largely intact. Earlier coverage focused on the IEEPA ruling as a concrete check on presidential tariff power; newer reporting, led by outlets flagging Bessent’s comments, has shifted the narrative to emphasize an administrative workaround that could reintroduce similar duties under different legal authorities, altering both market expectations and the political landscape around forthcoming U.S.–China trade interactions.
📊 Relevant Data
The U.S. current-account deficit narrowed to $1.12 trillion in 2025, representing 3.6 percent of current-dollar gross domestic product, down from $1.19 trillion or 4.0 percent of GDP in 2024.
U.S. International Transactions and Investment Position, Fourth Quarter and Year 2025 — Bureau of Economic Analysis
Trump's tariffs enacted in 2025 have raised an estimated $214.7 billion in inflation-adjusted customs revenue above the 2022–2024 average as of April 2026, but have also reduced U.S. real GDP growth by 0.5 percentage points in 2025 from the April announcements alone.
Tracking the Economic Effects of Tariffs — The Budget Lab at Yale
Section 301 investigations target unfair trade practices including structural excess capacity and overproduction in manufacturing sectors from 16 trading partners, such as China, potentially leading to retaliatory tariffs.
USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigations Relating to Structural Excess Capacity and Production — Office of the United States Trade Representative
Tariff actions by the Trump administration, including Section 232 and 301, have resulted in a net economic impact that is small in aggregate but with significant distributional effects across industries, benefiting some like manufacturing while increasing costs for consumers and importers.
Tariffs in 2025: Short-run impacts on the US economy — Brookings Institution
The permanent Section 232 tariffs are estimated to reduce long-run U.S. GDP by 0.2 percent before foreign retaliation, with additional negative effects from trade war escalations.
Tracking the Impact of the Trump Tariffs & Trade War — Tax Foundation
📌 Key Facts
- The Supreme Court ruled in February 2026 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize tariffs, striking down Trump’s IEEPA-based tariff program.
- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday that Section 301 investigations could allow Trump’s tariffs to be reinstated at previous levels by the beginning of July.
- Customs and Border Protection collected more than $133 billion in IEEPA-based tariff duties as of mid-December, rising to about $166 billion by early March 2026 before the ruling.
- The Trump administration has launched more than 75 Section 301 investigations since the Court’s decision, far above the historic average, to justify new retaliatory import restrictions.
- Trump also announced a separate 10% global tariff under Trade Act Section 122, a 150‑day emergency tariff authority, which has triggered a lawsuit by 24 state attorneys general.
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time