Bodycam Video Shows St. Louis Officer Shoot Fleeing 17‑Year‑Old Emeshyon Wilkins in Back of Head
Bodycam footage released after a year-long legal fight shows a St. Louis police officer shooting 17‑year‑old Emeshyon Wilkins in the back of the head as he fled following a stop of a reportedly stolen vehicle, contradicting earlier accounts from investigators. The newly published video does not show Wilkins pointing a gun at officers; a federal lawsuit filed on his family's behalf says the firearm recovered from Wilkins was disassembled into multiple pieces in his pocket and therefore incapable of being fired. The family’s attorney only obtained the footage after filing a federal suit and a denied records request, underscoring the delay in public access to the bodycam material.
St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department officials have acknowledged that initial information provided to investigators and the public was not consistent with what the video shows, and the department says it has revised protocols so that body‑camera personnel respond to scenes and footage is reviewed before releasing initial statements. Legal commentators on social media and elsewhere note the split between criminal‑law standards—whether an officer reasonably believed an imminent threat existed—and civil liability, with observers saying the disassembled gun parts and the video are likely to shape a substantial civil lawsuit even if prosecutors assess the officer’s perception of threat differently.
Public reaction on social platforms has been immediate and forceful: national outlets and users highlighted the contradiction between early police statements and the footage, with some commenters condemning the shooting outright and others urging transparency reforms. Coverage that drove the narrative shift came after the bodycam was obtained and shared by outlets including CBS and ABC, which emphasized how the video altered the account of what happened and prompted the department to change how it handles body‑camera evidence and public briefings.
📌 Key Facts
- Newly released bodycam video shows a St. Louis police officer shooting 17‑year‑old Emeshyon Wilkins in the back of the head as he fled; the footage does not show Wilkins pointing a gun.
- The firearm recovered on Wilkins was disassembled into multiple pieces in his pocket and, according to a federal lawsuit, was incapable of being fired.
- The family's attorney obtained the bodycam footage only after a year‑long fight that included filing a federal lawsuit following a denied records request.
- The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department acknowledged that initial information given to investigators and the public was not consistent with what the video shows.
- SLMPD said it has changed protocols so body‑camera personnel respond to scenes and footage is reviewed before the department issues initial public statements.
📊 Analysis & Commentary (1)
"A City Journal opinion piece critiques the media and activist tendency to rush to racialized explanations of police shootings — arguing that alleged racism is often treated as a worse offense than the underlying criminal act and that such framing can preempt a full, evidence‑based accounting (matching the Emeshyon Wilkins bodycam shooting story)."
📰 Source Timeline (2)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time
- Confirms via newly released bodycam video that the officer shot 17‑year‑old Emeshyon Wilkins in the back of the head as he fled and that the video does not show him pointing a gun.
- Details that the firearm found on Wilkins was disassembled in multiple pieces in his pocket and incapable of being fired, according to the federal lawsuit.
- Reveals that the family’s attorney obtained the bodycam only after a year‑long fight that required filing a federal lawsuit, following a denied records request.
- Reports SLMPD’s acknowledgment that initial information given to investigators and the public was not consistent with actual events, and that the department has since changed protocols so body‑camera personnel respond to scenes and footage is reviewed before initial statements.