Back to all stories
WASHINGTON (July 10, 2024) Working canines and their handlers from multiple Department of Homeland Security Agencies, participate in a DHS Working Canine Showcase on the Hill, at the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C. (DHS photo by Mikaela McGee)
Photo: DHSgov | Public domain | Wikimedia Commons

DHS Watchdog Probes Noem‑Era Contracting and Lewandowski’s Vendor Contacts

An expansive investigation by the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general is scrutinizing how contracts were handled under former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, with a particular focus on senior adviser Corey Lewandowski’s interactions with companies seeking federal business, according to multiple people familiar with the probe. The inquiry appears to center on whether Lewandowski’s access and political ties influenced procurement decisions or created improper pressure on DHS officials and vendors during Noem’s tenure. While details of specific contracts under review have not been publicly disclosed, the fact that the IG has opened such a wide‑ranging case signals serious concern inside the department about potential favoritism or abuse in awarding taxpayer‑funded work. Ethics and watchdog circles online are already drawing parallels to past influence‑peddling scandals and warning that, in wartime and amid a partial DHS shutdown, steering contracts to politically connected firms could carry both financial and national‑security costs. The investigation’s findings could fuel broader fights in Congress over Trump‑era DHS governance and the role of campaign operatives inside federal agencies.

DHS Oversight and Ethics Trump Administration Governance

📌 Key Facts

  • DHS’s Office of Inspector General is conducting an 'expansive' inquiry into contracting under former Secretary Kristi Noem.
  • The probe is examining senior adviser Corey Lewandowski’s interactions with companies seeking DHS contracts.
  • Multiple people familiar with the investigation confirmed its scope, though specific contracts and timelines have not yet been detailed publicly.

📊 Relevant Data

In fiscal year 2020, Black-owned small businesses received 1.6% (or $9 billion) of the $560 billion in federal contracting dollars eligible for small businesses, despite Black-owned firms comprising about 10% of all U.S. businesses.

Companies aren't disclosing contracting data. It's hurting minority-owned businesses — Brookings Institution

In fiscal year 2020, Latino- or Hispanic-owned small businesses received 1.8% (or $10 billion) of the $560 billion in federal contracting dollars eligible for small businesses, despite comprising about 18% of the U.S. population and a significant share of businesses.

Companies aren't disclosing contracting data. It's hurting minority-owned businesses — Brookings Institution

Federal contracts with higher levels of STEM intensity are 10.9 times less likely to be awarded to Black-owned businesses and 3.5 times less likely to Hispanic-owned businesses, based on analysis of 1,551,610 contracts from 2019-2021.

A granular examination of gender and racial disparities in federal procurement — Data & Policy (Cambridge University Press)

In fiscal year 2021, minority-owned businesses represented 24% of businesses eligible for federal contracts but received only 3% of all federal contract awards, indicating a 21-percentage point gap.

Progress in Procurement: Equity in Federal Contracting — U.S. Department of Labor

📰 Source Timeline (1)

Follow how coverage of this story developed over time

April 03, 2026
9:30 PM
Friday’s Mini-Report, 4.3.26
MS NOW by Steve Benen