DOJ Reassigns Lawyers, Crippling Immigration Legal‑Aid Accreditation Program
The Justice Department has quietly reassigned the small team of senior attorneys who run its 60‑year‑old Recognition and Accreditation program, which authorizes non‑attorney staff at largely faith‑based organizations such as Catholic Charities and Jewish Family Services to provide affordable legal help to immigrants before DHS and in DOJ immigration courts. Sources told CBS News the lawyers were abruptly ordered last week by Jamee Comans, acting assistant director for EOIR’s Office of Policy, to report to immigration courts as entry‑level law clerks, leaving only two support staff with no authority to approve or renew accreditation for the more than 2,600 accredited representatives at over 900 programs. EOIR declined to discuss the personnel moves, while a government official insisted the program is not being abolished, and two additional employees were only later assigned to review pending applications after CBS began asking questions. Legal‑aid leaders say the move comes on top of earlier cuts to DOJ’s Office of Legal Access Programs, immigration‑court orientation services and the firing or removal of more than 100 immigration judges, and warn that hobbling the accreditation system will further overwhelm an already backlogged immigration system and leave low‑income immigrants without meaningful representation. Immigrant‑rights groups are treating the shift as a major, under‑the‑radar policy change in how the Trump administration is reshaping access to counsel in immigration proceedings, even as DOJ offers no public explanation.
📌 Key Facts
- The DOJ’s Executive Office for Immigration Review reassigned the handful of senior attorneys who run the Recognition and Accreditation program to immigration‑court clerk roles last week.
- The R&A program currently accredits more than 2,600 non‑attorney representatives across more than 900 recognized legal‑aid programs nationwide.
- After CBS sought comment, EOIR assigned two additional employees to review pending R&A applications, but they do not replace the removed senior attorneys who had authority and expertise over the program.
📊 Relevant Data
In FY 2025, overall legal representation in US immigration courts was 38%, with disparities by language: 34% for Spanish speakers compared to 75% for Mandarin speakers and 84% for Punjabi speakers.
Noncitizen Access to Legal Counsel in Immigration Court Differs by Language Spoken — TRAC Reports
From 2013-2024, immigrants with legal counsel were 4.6 times more likely to succeed in avoiding deportation, with 64% of represented immigrants avoiding deportation compared to 14% of unrepresented ones.
Access to Counsel in Immigration Court, Revisited — Iowa Law Review
The US immigration court backlog reached 3.6 million pending cases by the end of 2024, with average wait times of 649 days.
Access to Counsel in Immigration Court, Revisited — Iowa Law Review
From 2013-2024, legal representation rates in completed removal cases varied by nationality: 50% for Mexicans, 41% for Hondurans, 35% for Colombians, 71% for Indians, and 91% for Chinese.
Access to Counsel in Immigration Court, Revisited — Iowa Law Review
Net immigration to the US was negative in 2025, estimated between -10,000 and -295,000, the first negative since at least half a century, due to decreased immigration and increased emigration.
Macroeconomic implications of immigration flows in 2025 and 2026 — Brookings Institution
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time