Chief Justice Roberts Warns Personal Attacks on Judges Are 'Dangerous'
Chief Justice John Roberts, speaking Tuesday at Rice University's Baker Institute in Houston, warned that personally targeted attacks on Supreme Court justices and lower federal judges are 'dangerous' and 'have got to stop.' Roberts said judges' legal reasoning is rightly subject to scrutiny and criticism, including from dissenting justices, but cautioned that attacks focused on personalities rather than legal analysis can create real risks in an environment where threats against judges have already surged. His comments came after President Donald Trump denounced the Supreme Court’s recent 6–3 decision invalidating much of his tariff program, personally attacking Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett—his own appointees—as an 'embarrassment to their families' and accusing the Court without evidence of being 'swayed by foreign interests.' Trump has also repeatedly vilified individual lower-court judges by name, most recently calling U.S. District Judge James Boasberg 'wacky, nasty, cooked, and totally out of control' after Boasberg quashed Justice Department subpoenas for Federal Reserve records. Roberts, who has rarely spoken publicly on these matters, framed impeachment threats and personal vilification of jurists as an improper response to disagreements with judicial decisions, underscoring growing concern inside the judiciary about the safety and independence of judges in the current political climate.
📌 Key Facts
- Chief Justice John Roberts spoke at Rice University's Baker Institute in Houston on Tuesday, answering questions from U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal.
- Roberts said that while judicial opinions should be subject to criticism, 'personally directed hostility is dangerous and it's got to stop.'
- He warned that criticism has increasingly shifted from legal analysis to personal attacks on judges from 'all over, not just any one political perspective.'
- The remarks followed President Trump’s harsh reactions to a 6–3 Supreme Court ruling striking down much of his tariff program, including personal attacks on Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett.
- Trump has also attacked lower-court judges by name, most recently Judge James Boasberg, after Boasberg blocked DOJ subpoenas seeking Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s records.
📊 Relevant Data
Serious threats against U.S. federal judges more than doubled over the past three years from 2021 to 2023, rising from around 220 in 2021 to over 457 in 2023, amid a growing wave of politically driven violence.
US judges saw sharp rise in threats related to political violence, data shows — The Guardian
In 2023, there were 457 federal judges targeted with threats and 155 federal prosecutors, with threats against protected court personnel increasing by 178% since 2019.
Federal judges, prosecutors see triple-digit increase in threats in 2023 — ABC News
Threats against federal judges have risen drastically since President Trump took office, with data showing 162 judges facing threats between March 1 and April 14, 2025, amid increased political rhetoric.
Marshals' Data Shows Spike in Threats Against Federal Judges — The New York Times
Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence, with data from 2010 to 2024 showing right-wing extremists responsible for 329 fatalities compared to 117 from left-wing extremists, in the context of threats to public officials including judges.
Analysis: What data shows about political extremist violence — PBS
Violent threats and calls for impeachment against U.S. judges on social media have increased by 327% since 2024, often linked to political cases and rhetoric.
Violent Threats Against US Judges Are Skyrocketing Online — WIRED
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time