Back to all stories

Jury Deliberates in FirstEnergy Ex‑Executives’ Ohio Bribery Trial

Jurors in Akron, Ohio have begun deliberating in the corruption trial of former FirstEnergy CEO Chuck Jones and ex–senior vice president Michael Dowling, who are accused of helping orchestrate a $60 million bribery scheme that secured a $1 billion nuclear plant bailout through Ohio’s House Bill 6. Prosecutors say the pair paid $4.3 million to future Public Utilities Commission of Ohio chair Sam Randazzo in early 2019 to secure favorable legislative and regulatory treatment that boosted FirstEnergy’s bottom line and, by extension, their own compensation. In two days of closing arguments, the state framed the payment as a carefully structured payoff that "rigged" a process meant to be fair to Ohio ratepayers, pointing to texts, meeting notes, and advice they traded while preparing to meet then–Gov.-elect Mike DeWine and then–Lt. Gov.-elect Jon Husted. Defense attorneys counter that the money was a legitimate settlement for Randazzo’s Industrial Energy Users‑Ohio clients and argue the state is stacking assumptions without hard proof that Jones and Dowling intended a bribe. The case is a key chapter in the wider House Bill 6 scandal and is being closely watched by energy regulators, consumer advocates and investors as a test of how aggressively states will hold utility executives personally liable for pay‑to‑play schemes that hit ratepayers’ bills.

Corporate Corruption and Utilities State Courts and Public Corruption

📌 Key Facts

  • Jury deliberations began Tuesday, March 17, 2026, in Akron after closing arguments.
  • Former FirstEnergy CEO Chuck Jones and ex–senior vice president Michael Dowling are charged with corruption, bribery, conspiracy and aggravated theft.
  • Prosecutors allege a $4.3 million payment to Sam Randazzo, later chair of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, was a bribe tied to the $1 billion House Bill 6 nuclear bailout; the defense says it was a lawful settlement for his Industrial Energy Users‑Ohio clients.

📊 Relevant Data

In Ohio, Black households experience higher energy burdens, with energy costs consuming a larger share of their income compared to White households, exacerbating disparities in utility affordability.

Ohio disconnection data still lacks detail on racial disparities — Ohio Capital Journal

Historical redlining in Ohio has contributed to ongoing racial disparities in housing and energy efficiency, with formerly redlined areas, often with higher Black populations, facing 20-30% higher energy burdens due to disinvestment.

Racism was the primary reason Ohio neighborhoods were redlined, new study shows — Ideastream Public Media

Ohio's House Bill 6 imposes approximately $1 billion in subsidies on ratepayers over six years, increasing electricity costs that disproportionately affect low-income and minority households with higher energy burdens.

HB 6 costs go well beyond claimed harm to public trust — Eye on Ohio

📰 Source Timeline (1)

Follow how coverage of this story developed over time