Sotomayor, Jackson Dissent as Supreme Court Won’t Hear Indigent Prisoners’ Filing‑Fee Case
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal from California prisoners Topaz Johnson and Ian Henderson over whether indigent inmates can split the $350 filing fee for a federal civil‑rights lawsuit, prompting a pointed dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The men alleged corrections officers at High Desert State Prison forced them and a third prisoner to stand for nearly nine hours, handcuffed, in filthy 2.5‑by‑2.5‑foot cages that reeked of urine, and sought to sue jointly, but a trial judge and the 9th Circuit required each to pay the full $350. Sotomayor called the lower court’s reading of federal law “likely incorrect,” warned it produces “unfair results” and needless duplicate litigation, and noted that prisoners who want to take such disputes to the Supreme Court must pay another $600, an enormous barrier for people earning cents per hour. Justice Elena Kagan separately indicated she would have granted review but did not join the dissent, leaving the three liberal justices one vote short of the four needed to take the case. The decision leaves in place a fee rule that limits collective suits by poor prisoners under the Prison Litigation Reform Act and, as Sotomayor put it, makes it harder for them even to “knock on this Court’s door.”
📌 Key Facts
- Case involves indigent prisoners Topaz Johnson and Ian Henderson at High Desert State Prison in California alleging they were confined for nearly nine hours in 2.5‑by‑2.5‑foot filthy cages while handcuffed.
- A district court and the 9th Circuit held that each prisoner must pay the full $350 filing fee even when they bring a joint lawsuit, and an additional $600 is required to seek Supreme Court review.
- Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari, calling the 9th Circuit’s interpretation “likely incorrect” and urging the Court to take a future case on the issue; Justice Elena Kagan would have granted review but did not join the dissent.
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time