Evanston to Send $25,000 Reparations Checks to 44 Black Residents
Evanston, Illinois’ Reparations Committee has approved a new round of $25,000 direct cash payments to 44 eligible Black residents or descendants of Black residents who lived in the city between 1919 and 1969, part of a $10 million, decade‑long municipal reparations program. City officials say the payments are intended to support housing expenses and will be sent out in the coming weeks, funded primarily by cannabis sales tax and the city’s real estate transfer tax, which has contributed about $276,000 so far. Assistant to the city manager Tasheik Kerr told the committee the recipients will be contacted soon, while Ald. Krissie Harris stressed that payouts are limited by how quickly the city can accumulate revenue and that the panel is even weighing a tax on Delta‑8 THC products to sustain funding. According to Judicial Watch, which is suing Evanston, the city has already awarded more than $6.35 million to 254 individuals under the program, which is restricted to Black residents and their descendants. That lawsuit argues the race‑based eligibility rules violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, setting up a constitutional test case that could shape similar local reparations efforts now being explored in other U.S. cities and states.
📌 Key Facts
- Evanston’s Reparations Committee authorized $25,000 direct cash payments to 44 residents in a decision announced Thursday.
- Eligibility is limited to Black residents and descendants of Black residents who lived in Evanston between 1919 and 1969, with funds earmarked primarily for housing costs.
- The city has pledged $10 million over 10 years, has already awarded about $6.35 million to 254 individuals, and faces a Judicial Watch lawsuit alleging the race‑based program violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.
- Current funding comes from cannabis sales tax and real estate transfer taxes, with roughly $276,588 from transfer taxes and a possible new Delta‑8 THC tax under discussion.
📰 Source Timeline (1)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time