February 10, 2026
Back to all stories

Ring AI feature sparks Minnesota privacy, surveillance concerns

A Super Bowl ad for Ring’s new AI tool — which can scan neighboring Ring cameras to help find lost pets — is prompting Minnesota privacy experts and lawmakers to question how far neighborhood surveillance should go, especially given Ring’s partnership with law‑enforcement tech vendor Flock. University of Minnesota media-law professor Jane Kirtley said she was struck by how openly the company promoted such a sweeping capability, warning it normalizes pervasive private and corporate monitoring. Privacy advocates worry that data from Ring devices across Twin Cities blocks could be pooled, analyzed or shared with police or federal agencies without clear state limits. Unlike a handful of states that already restrict how private-video data can be shared, Minnesota has no such statutes, and legislators now say they may take up camera and data‑sharing rules in the upcoming session in direct response to the ad. How many Ring users will opt into the feature and what exact bills emerge at the Capitol remain unclear, but the fight lines are already forming between those who see a lost‑pet finder and those who see a neighborhood‑wide dragnet.

Technology Legal Local Government

📌 Key Facts

  • Ring, owned by Amazon, aired a Super Bowl ad touting an AI feature that can access neighborhood Ring cameras to locate lost pets.
  • UMN media-law professor Jane Kirtley says Ring was 'candid' about the surveillance power of the tool, raising ethical and legal concerns.
  • Ring’s partnership with Flock Safety, which sells camera and plate‑reader systems to police, heightens fears that pooled neighborhood video in Minnesota could be used for broader law‑enforcement surveillance absent state‑level data‑sharing limits.
  • Minnesota currently has no statute limiting how private companies share home‑camera video, and legislators say they’re likely to consider new privacy protections in the coming session because of the ad.

📊 Relevant Data

The Federal Trade Commission charged Ring with compromising customer privacy by allowing employees and contractors to access sensitive video data, resulting in a $5.8 million settlement in 2023.

FTC Says Ring Employees Illegally Surveilled Customers, Failed to Stop Hackers from Taking Control of Users' Devices — Federal Trade Commission

Surveillance cameras are disproportionately installed in racially diverse neighborhoods in U.S. cities, particularly in areas experiencing demographic changes toward greater diversity.

Surveillance cameras are clustered in racially diverse U.S. neighborhoods — Stanford University Department of Sociology

A class action lawsuit alleges that Ring video doorbells violate Illinois privacy law by collecting and storing biometric information without user consent.

Ring class action over face scan privacy escapes dismissal — Top Class Actions

In 2025, states such as Arkansas, Idaho, and Montana enacted laws to protect personal data collected through surveillance technologies, limiting sharing with law enforcement without restrictions.

Worried about surveillance, states enact privacy laws and restrict license plate readers — Route Fifty

A 2024 U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report highlighted racial disparities in the accuracy and deployment of facial recognition technology used by federal law enforcement agencies.

Watchdog rings alarms bell on disparities in law enforcement AI tool — USA Today

📰 Source Timeline (1)

Follow how coverage of this story developed over time

February 10, 2026
3:37 PM
Ring's AI feature raises privacy alarms
FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul by Corin.Hoggard@fox.com (Corin Hoggard)