February 09, 2026
Back to all stories

Labor Department Bars Staff Lawyers From Official ABA Participation

Trump‑appointed Solicitor of Labor Jonathan Berry has ordered all Department of Labor attorneys to stop engaging with the American Bar Association (ABA) in their official capacities, telling staff in a Monday email they may not use taxpayer funds to attend ABA events or appear there using their government titles. Berry’s directive, obtained by Fox News, calls the ABA a "radical" ideological organization that presents itself as neutral while backing positions such as LGBTQ+ rights, abortion access, stricter gun control and DEI initiatives, and argues federal participation only bolsters its influence. The move follows similar Trump‑era actions: the Justice Department last year cut off advance ABA vetting of judicial nominees and tried to terminate more than $3 million in ABA grants before a judge found that defunding unconstitutional, and the Federal Trade Commission severed ties with the ABA’s antitrust section, accusing it of serving "Big Tech." Republicans have long criticized the ABA as biased toward Democrats, while the bar group describes itself as the "national voice of the legal profession" and has condemned what it calls Trump’s "wide-scale affronts to the rule of law." Berry said that although there can be "genuine benefit" to interacting with private‑sector lawyers at ABA programs, that benefit "feeds the problem" by enhancing the ABA’s institutional stature, and concluded, "No more."

Trump Administration and the Legal System American Bar Association and Judicial Vetting

📌 Key Facts

  • Solicitor of Labor Jonathan Berry emailed hundreds of Labor Department attorneys Monday ordering them not to use taxpayer funds for ABA events or appear there with official titles.
  • Berry’s email labels the ABA "strategically equivocal" and "radical" and argues federal participation falsely lends neutrality to its advocacy on issues like LGBTQ+ rights, abortion and gun control.
  • The order extends the Trump administration’s broader break with the ABA, after DOJ stopped giving it advance notice on judicial nominees and tried to cut ABA grants, and after the FTC cut off its antitrust collaboration.

📰 Source Timeline (1)

Follow how coverage of this story developed over time