Judge Engelmayer approves DOJ release of Maxwell files under Epstein transparency law

📌 Key Facts

• Congress enacted the Epstein Files Transparency Act after a bipartisan discharge petition (led by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie) reached the required signatures when Rep. Adelita Grijalva was sworn in; the House then approved the measure overwhelmingly and the Senate cleared it by unanimous consent, and President Trump—after publicly reversing prior opposition—signed the bill, triggering a 30‑day statutory deadline for DOJ to publish unclassified Epstein‑related records (public‑release target Dec. 19).
• The law requires the Department of Justice, the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to publish within 30 days all unclassified records tied to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in a searchable format, permits redactions for victims’ personally identifiable information, child sexual abuse material, classified national‑security information and narrowly tailored protections for active investigations or prosecutions, and bars withholding material for mere "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity."
• DOJ filed expedited motions in multiple federal courts asking judges to unseal grand jury transcripts, discovery and other materials—arguing the new statute changes the legal standard—and outlined roughly 18 categories of Maxwell‑case materials it seeks to release (search warrants, financial records, survivor interview notes, electronic device data, flight logs, witness interviews, documents about Epstein’s 2019 death investigation, etc.).
• Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ordered DOJ to provide a detailed list of Maxwell materials it plans to make public (setting a briefing schedule with victims’ and Maxwell’s responses due Dec. 3 and DOJ’s reply due Dec. 10) and has granted DOJ’s request to publicly release investigative materials from the Ghislaine Maxwell case under the Transparency Act; the court said records could be released within about 10 days to help meet the Dec. 19 deadline.
• The government’s push to unseal follows earlier judicial refusals (including an August denial by Judge Richard Berman regarding grand jury materials) and a continuing legal dispute over whether and how grand‑jury and other sealed materials must be disclosed under the new law; DOJ and SDNY attorneys have asked judges to revisit those prior rulings in light of the statute.
• Survivors and many victim attorneys have urged full transparency and backed unsealing but have simultaneously pressed courts and DOJ for strong privacy safeguards; judges are reviewing sensitive items in camera and parties acknowledge redactions will be applied to protect victims and prevent dissemination of sexualized images.
• Officials estimate the corpus of records is large (on the order of ~100,000 pages); Attorney General Pam Bondi said DOJ will comply and publish materials in a searchable format consistent with the law, while critics and some lawmakers warned that new DOJ investigations or claims of ongoing probes could be used to delay or narrowly redact significant portions of the disclosures.

📰 Sources (58)

+ 38 more sources