House moderates join Democrats to force vote on ACA subsidy extension
House moderates joined Democrats to file a discharge petition and force a floor vote on a three‑year extension of enhanced ACA premium tax credits after Speaker Mike Johnson refused to guarantee a House vote, reflecting growing GOP fractures and concern that millions of enrollees would face steep premium spikes if the subsidies lapsed. The push — backed by multiple moderate Republicans who later helped advance the measure — unfolded amid a bruising shutdown and competing Senate and White House proposals, but still faces heavy odds in the GOP‑controlled Senate.
📌 Key Facts
- A 43‑day government shutdown and repeated Senate rejections of the House continuing resolution (more than a dozen failed votes) were driven in large part by Democratic demands for an extension of enhanced ACA (Obamacare) premium tax credits.
- Democrats insisted on a guaranteed outcome — not just promises — on extending the enhanced premium tax credits; Senate GOP leaders offered a Senate vote, but House Speaker Mike Johnson repeatedly refused to guarantee a House vote, deepening the impasse.
- Multiple bipartisan and GOP proposals surfaced during negotiations (one‑year or two‑year extensions, White House two‑year draft with a 700% FPL cap and minimum premiums, Senate GOP ideas to redirect funds into HSAs or patient accounts, and House 'CommonGround' and Fitzpatrick/Suozzi frameworks), but lawmakers disagreed over eligibility caps, minimum premiums, Hyde/abortion language, and offsets.
- House Democrats used a discharge petition to force action; moderates in both parties joined them — four Republicans first signed to reach the 218 threshold in mid‑December, and a broader group (nine Republicans) later broke with leadership to advance the measure — producing a House vote on a three‑year extension of the enhanced credits in early January.
- Congress failed to enact an extension before the December 31 deadline: the enhanced ACA subsidies expired Dec. 31, 2025 (lapsed Jan. 1, 2026), prompting insurers to set 2026 rates assuming the lapse and triggering open‑enrollment and affordability crises.
- Analyses and agencies warn of large impacts if subsidies lapse: CBO estimated extending the enhanced credits would cost roughly $23 billion next year and hundreds of billions over a decade; KFF, CBPP and other analyses projected average premium increases (commonly cited ~114% on average, with many more extreme local spikes), and estimates ranged from millions (CBO ~2 million; other analyses up to ~4 million) potentially losing coverage or dropping marketplace plans.
- After the lapse, senators and negotiators renewed bipartisan talks on a time‑limited rescue with design changes (income caps, small required premiums to replace zero‑premium plans, options to direct funds to accounts or premiums, anti‑fraud guardrails), but any Senate solution faces procedural hurdles (60‑vote cloture) and likely requires White House/President Trump support; the fight has also deepened House GOP divisions and prompted threats of intra‑party retaliation against moderates who forced the vote.
📊 Relevant Data
If enhanced ACA premium tax credits expire, Mississippi is projected to experience a 65% increase in its uninsured rate in 2026, the highest among states, followed by South Carolina at 50%, Tennessee at 41%, Texas at 39%, and Alabama at 37%.
States ranked by uninsured increases as ACA subsidies expire in 2025: Report — Becker's Payer Review
Allowing the enhanced ACA premium tax credits to expire is projected to result in nearly 340,000 job losses across the U.S. in 2026, primarily due to reduced consumer spending as higher premiums strain household budgets and decrease economic activity in healthcare and related sectors.
Expiring ACA Premium Tax Credits Could Lead to Nearly 340,000 Jobs Lost Across the U.S. in 2026 — Commonwealth Fund
Medicaid expansion under the ACA has significantly reduced uninsurance rates among nonelderly Black adults, with rates dropping from 18.6% in 2013 to 9.3% in 2021 in expansion states, compared to a smaller drop from 25.3% to 16.7% in non-expansion states, where 2021 uninsurance rates for Black adults remained over 16%.
Medicaid Expansion Lowered Uninsurance Rates Among Nonelderly Black Adults in the U.S., with Greater Effects in Expansion States — Health Affairs
In 2021-2024, rural consumers eligible for ACA subsidies in HealthCare.gov states received an average increase of $74 in monthly premium tax credits compared to urban consumers, who received $59, reflecting higher baseline premiums and greater subsidy reliance in rural areas.
Trends in Health Insurance Coverage and Access to Care, 2021-2024 — ASPE (Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, HHS)
📊 Analysis & Commentary (8)
"The op‑ed criticizes Democratic calls for new government spending to address affordability—arguing it's hypocritical for the party to propose more programs as a remedy for higher costs their policies helped create and expressing skepticism that more government spending will solve the problem."
"The piece is a critical opinion response to proposals (advocated by Trump and allies) to replace ACA premium tax credits with direct cash or HSA payments, arguing the change would favor the wealthy, push people into high‑deductible plans, raise out‑of‑pocket risk, destabilize the ACA marketplaces, and harm working Americans."
"Josh Barro argues that Republican health‑care rhetoric ignores an unavoidable trilemma — you cannot simultaneously reject mandates, reject subsidies, and preserve protections for those with pre‑existing conditions — explaining why GOP leaders (and the shutdown debate over ACA subsidies) lack a coherent policy."
"A Manhattan Institute commentary argues that Republicans need not accept an impossible 'trilemma' over the fate of enhanced Obamacare subsidies — instead they should pragmatically avert a lapse (or offer a short extension) to avoid voter harm and use negotiations to pursue market‑oriented reforms, while warning that President Trump’s demand for immediate direct payments is impractical and politically risky."
"The Politico newsletter surveys the final‑week Washington calendar and zeroes in on the high‑stakes fight over expiring enhanced ACA subsidies — noting a House GOP package that omits an extension, an anticipated amendment vote to avert premium spikes, and broader political dynamics that make a last‑minute bipartisan fix uncertain."
"A Wall Street Journal editorial defends the House GOP health‑care bill (led by Speaker Mike Johnson) as a responsible, choice‑focused alternative to Democrats’ push to extend enhanced ACA subsidies and criticizes the left’s framing that refusing an extension is 'irresponsible.'"
"The WSJ opinion critiques GOP moderates who, by siding with Democrats on an ACA‑subsidy discharge petition, have effectively held Speaker Mike Johnson and the narrow House majority hostage, illustrating how a few swing members can derail party priorities."
"The Politico column connects the expiration of enhanced ACA premium tax credits — which will sharply raise marketplace premiums for millions — with the inauguration of affordability-focused mayor Zohran Mamdani, arguing the subsidy lapse crystallizes 'affordability' as 2025’s defining political issue and a test for Democratic leaders while criticizing federal failure to prevent the lapse."
📰 Source Timeline (87)
Follow how coverage of this story developed over time
- Nine House Republicans voted Wednesday evening to advance a Democrat‑led bill extending enhanced Obamacare subsidies that expired at the end of last year.
- Four GOP moderates — Reps. Mike Lawler (R‑N.Y.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R‑Pa.), Rob Bresnahan (R‑Pa.), and Ryan Mackenzie (R‑Pa.) — had already signed onto Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ discharge petition and were among the nine who voted to advance it.
- The other five Republicans backing advancement were Reps. Nick LaLota (R‑N.Y.), Maria Salazar (R‑Fla.), David Valadao (R‑Calif.), Max Miller (R‑Ohio), and Tom Kean Jr. (R‑N.J.).
- Speaker Mike Johnson had argued for weeks that most House Republicans opposed extending the pandemic‑era ACA subsidies, but this bloc of moderates broke with him citing leadership’s failure in both chambers to avert premium hikes.
- The House is expected to pass the three‑year subsidy extension on Thursday, though it is expected to fail in the GOP‑controlled Senate, where similar Democratic legislation could not clear 60 votes in December.
- House Republicans passed an alternative health‑care bill in mid‑December aimed at broader cost reductions, but the Senate has not taken it up.
- Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) is leading a small bipartisan group working on a two-year reinstatement of enhanced ACA subsidies, with a self-imposed deadline of the end of January 2026 and a stated goal of securing support from 35 Senate Republicans plus a Democratic majority.
- Draft framework under discussion includes capping eligibility for enhanced subsidies at 700% of the federal poverty line, replacing $0-premium marketplace plans with $5 premiums, and giving enrollees a choice to direct enhanced subsidies into Health Savings Accounts or directly toward premiums.
- Negotiators are exploring adding cost-sharing reductions beginning in the second year, which Moreno says could cut overall Obamacare premiums by roughly 11% while reducing federal costs, and are considering large penalties on insurers that enroll people into ACA coverage without their knowledge.
- The talks are hung up in part on abortion-related language, with both sides trying not to go beyond or below the traditional Hyde Amendment standard; Moreno explicitly frames the aim as respecting the existing Hyde 'tradition.'
- Majority Leader John Thune says any deal would need a 'big vote' among Republicans, and the article notes President Trump has urged House Republicans to 'own health care' and be 'flexible' on Hyde, potentially influencing the negotiations.
- Details that, after the lapse, House moderates and Democrats successfully forced a House vote on a three‑year extension of the enhanced ACA subsidies, scheduled for Thursday.
- Reports that House GOP committee leaders have summoned health insurers to hearings on rising health-care costs as a political and policy response to the extension vote.
- Clarifies that GOP leadership casts the ACA subsidies as helping only about 7% of Americans and prefers structural reforms like association health plans and future cost‑sharing reduction funding.
- NPR reports that a bipartisan group of senators has now negotiated a compromise to resurrect enhanced ACA tax credits after the lapse.
- Sen. Peter Welch says explicitly that the compromise legislation can only advance with Trump’s help.
- The article reiterates that millions of Americans are already facing higher premiums because the subsidies expired.
- Identifies Sen. Peter Welch as a key Democratic participant in fresh bipartisan Senate talks on an ACA subsidy compromise following the lapse.
- Reports that the emerging Senate concept could pair a time‑limited extension with design changes such as income caps, copays, and anti‑fraud penalties for insurers to attract bipartisan support.
- Clarifies that President Trump has so far remained relatively hands‑off on health‑care legislation but is seen by Welch as indispensable to moving any subsidy bill through GOP‑controlled chambers.
- Adds detail on House dynamics: a bipartisan group used a discharge petition shortly before recess to force a vote on a three‑year extension, and GOP Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick publicly defends supporting that clean extension over allowing subsidies to expire.
- Notes that moderates in both chambers, including Fitzpatrick and Suozzi, are coordinating strategy with senators on possible compromise paths.
- Moves the prior forward‑looking projections into the present tense by confirming that the enhanced ACA subsidies did in fact expire overnight on Jan. 1, 2026 after Congress failed to reach a deal.
- Adds specifics about the 43‑day shutdown and the subsequent political dynamics: Democrats forcing the shutdown over subsidies, moderate Republicans seeking a fix, and President Trump initially floating but then retreating from a compromise under conservative pressure.
- Provides updated narrative that a House vote is now expected in January as a potential—though uncertain—path to restoring the subsidies.
- Includes individual case studies showing how much monthly premiums are rising for particular enrollees, contextualizing earlier aggregate estimates.
- Reaffirms KFF’s estimate of an average 114% premium increase for subsidized enrollees rather than just a range of projections.
- KFF analysis cited that about 27% of U.S. agricultural workers rely on the individual insurance marketplace, compared with only about 6% of U.S. adults overall.
- Detailed case study of Louisiana farmer James Davis, 55, whose marketplace premium is expected to quadruple to about $2,700 a month in 2026 without enhanced subsidies.
- University of Nebraska Medical Center study is highlighted showing average non‑fatal farm injury costs roughly $10,878 in medical bills plus $4,735 in lost work.
- 2022 research by Penn State rural sociologist Florence Becot is referenced, finding more than 20% of U.S. farmers carry over $1,000 in medical debt and more than half are not confident they could cover a major illness or injury.
- Article underscores that more than a quarter of the agricultural workforce faces a choice between going uninsured or leaving farming for jobs with employer‑sponsored coverage as subsidies lapse, linking health‑insurance loss directly to potential exits from farming.
- Fox article stresses that with both partisan Senate plans having failed, the enhanced ACA subsidies are definitively set to expire on Dec. 31, with price hikes to begin Wednesday for "tens of millions" who relied on them (roughly 20 million enrollees).
- Kaiser Family Foundation estimates are highlighted more specifically: out-of-pocket premium costs are broadly expected to double, and some consumers could see increases as high as 361% depending on age, income, and location.
- The piece notes that four Republicans crossed the aisle to support Senate Democrats’ three-year extension bill, but both the Democratic and GOP Senate proposals failed, leaving no stopgap in place before the deadline.
- It details House dynamics more concretely: a GOP bill has already passed the House floor but does not address the tax-credit lapse, while a separate bipartisan House bill for a three-year extension of the subsidies is "teed up" for a vote.
- Sen. Brian Schatz is quoted arguing that if the bipartisan three-year extension passes the House, it should serve as the Senate’s vehicle, saying no further negotiation would be needed for a bipartisan deal.
- Sen. Josh Hawley is quoted focusing on constituent impact, warning that many people’s premiums will increase "two, three times."
- Clarifies that by the time the Senate returns, the enhanced ACA subsidies will already have expired, and senators are working on bipartisan options possibly built from House bills.
- Provides granular detail that Senate Democrats previously blocked a five‑bill funding package shortly before adjournment, forcing John Thune to pull it from the floor.
- Adds that Colorado’s Bennet and Hickenlooper are tying their support for appropriations to reversal of the Trump administration’s announced review and potential dismantling of NCAR in Boulder.
- Rep. Eric Swalwell, who is leaving Congress to run for California governor, publicly criticized Republicans for presiding over one of the least productive congressional sessions, citing lack of focus and bipartisanship.
- Swalwell said he sponsored one of roughly 40 substantive bills that became law in 2025, a bipartisan measure to ease airport screening of breast milk for breastfeeding mothers.
- The article quantifies activity in the first session of the 119th Congress: the House took 362 votes, compared with 710 during the comparable period of the 2015 Republican trifecta, and 61 bills became law, only 38 of which were more than simple resolutions.
- Sen. Ron Johnson accused Democrats of deliberately engineering the record 43‑day shutdown to prevent Republican legislative success and argued that Democrats "want the shutdown" because they prioritize regaining power over economic stability.
- The piece reiterates that when Congress returns in January it must both pass spending legislation by the end of the month to avoid another shutdown and decide whether to extend COVID‑era enhanced ACA subsidies, which Democrats warn could otherwise cause sharp premium hikes for roughly 24 million enrollees.
- Clarifies that with Congress out of session through the holidays, lawmakers failed to reconcile House and Senate positions on ACA subsidies before year‑end.
- Indicates Republicans have largely rejected a straight extension of COVID‑era subsidies, favoring broader reforms instead, though some moderates support a temporary extension.
- Frames the ACA subsidy fight as a central election‑year issue that GOP leaders will confront in 2026.
- Identifies the four GOP moderates who signed the Democratic discharge petition by name: Reps. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Robert Bresnahan (R-Pa.) and Ryan Mackenzie (R-Pa.).
- Details sharp public backlash from House conservatives, with quotes from Reps. Eric Burlison, Lauren Boebert and Randy Fine calling the move a 'betrayal' and 'bailout' of Obamacare.
- Reports the moderates' justification that House GOP leaders' failure to move a vote on any extension plan 'left us with little choice,' per Rep. Lawler.
- Notes that several GOP short‑term extension proposals existed but leaders in both chambers showed 'no appetite' to take them up before recess.
- Fox story provides on‑the‑ground description of Congress’ final meeting day before the recess, noting lawmakers left town Thursday afternoon with no ACA subsidy fix enacted.
- Confirms that the House is not scheduled to return until January 6, with the discharge petition not eligible for floor consideration until roughly January 8–9 because it must sit for seven legislative days.
- Quotes House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain predicting on Fox Business that the COVID‑era subsidy extension 'probably will pass' because four Republicans signed the discharge petition.
- Includes public comments from frontline Rep. Ryan Mackenzie, R-Pa., one of the four GOP signers, acknowledging political risk in his swing district but saying there is 'a long way to go before the midterms.'
- Adds fresh reaction from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warning that 'huge damage has already been done' and that actions after January 1 cannot fully undo the impact of premium hikes.
- Provides additional color quotes from GOP senators (Jon Husted, John Hoeven, Cynthia Lummis, Lindsey Graham) about the politics of acting in 2026 versus 2025, underscoring growing electoral pressure but no immediate solution.
- Gives broader context that overall House floor time in 2025 barely exceeded COVID-era voting days, despite unified Republican control and a stated priority to advance Trump’s MAGA agenda.
- Reports that Speaker Mike Johnson kept the House out for 54 days during the government shutdown, a major driver of the year’s unusually light House schedule.
- Details that Johnson repeatedly canceled votes when internal tensions flared or when legislation was unlikely to pass, using 'distance as a governing tool' but further shrinking days of floor action.
- Adds on-the-record criticism from GOP members (Thomas Massie, Kevin Kiley, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Greg Steube) asserting Johnson has 'squandered' Republicans’ governing window, left the House 'missing in action,' and operated in 'full obedience' to the White House.
- Notes that since passage of the 'one big, beautiful bill,' the House has failed to pass any additional appropriations bills and has allowed Democrats to seize the initiative on ACA subsidies by forcing a January vote.
- Conveys Johnson’s spokesperson’s counter‑argument that congressional Republicans executed 'the most ambitious and successful agenda by any Republican Congress in history,' citing the Working Families Tax Cut and codification of 70 Trump executive orders.
- SmartAsset analysis using CMS 2025 Marketplace Open Enrollment data estimates that, without the enhanced ACA subsidies, average 2025 monthly premiums in Mississippi would have been $605 instead of $41 (a 1,376% increase), and West Virginia enrollees would have seen an average 1,058% increase.
- KFF estimates that annual out-of-pocket premium costs will rise 114% on average for about 22 million ACA enrollees who currently receive the enhanced subsidies.
- Article reiterates that both chambers of Congress have left Washington until early next year, effectively ensuring the enhanced tax credits will expire on December 31 before any House discharge vote can be held.
- CBO estimate highlighted that if credits are not renewed, about 4 million people could drop ACA coverage entirely, which experts say would increase uncompensated care and push hospitals to raise prices for all payers.
- Hakeem Jeffries’ discharge petition to extend enhanced ACA premium tax credits has now reached the 218-signature threshold, with four moderate Republicans joining on Wednesday.
- Around 22 million Americans who purchase insurance on ACA exchanges are identified as facing steep premium increases if the enhanced credits expire Dec. 31.
- Speaker Mike Johnson says House rules requiring seven legislative days before a discharge motion can be brought to the floor are a "rule that cannot be broken," and he indicates the extension will be considered in the first week of January, calling a vote "inevitable."
- Democrats publicly demand that the House not adjourn until the ACA tax credits are extended and urge Johnson to expedite a vote as he did previously on the Epstein files bill.
- Sen. Lisa Murkowski says the successful House discharge petition "gives momentum" to bipartisan talks in the Senate and expects discussions to continue over the holiday, with the petition potentially serving as a vehicle for a compromise that includes reforms.
- Four Republicans — Brian Fitzpatrick (R‑Pa.), Mike Lawler (R‑N.Y.), Robert Bresnahan (R‑Pa.) and Ryan Mackenzie (R‑Pa.) — signed the discharge petition on Wednesday, providing the necessary GOP support to force a House vote on extending ACA premium tax credits.
- Rep. Eric Burlison (R‑Mo.) said centrist Republicans who signed the petition "need not ask me for any help in their campaigns whatsoever," underscoring threats of intra‑party retaliation.
- Rep. Don Bacon (R‑Neb.) criticized leadership strategy, saying Republicans are now "voting for the worse" Democratic offer because their own compromise was never put on the floor.
- Rep. Thomas Massie (R‑Ky.) said there is currently "no real threat" to Johnson’s speakership and predicted, "Johnson will be speaker til the day President Trump doesn't want him to be speaker."
- Johnson publicly insisted he has not "lost control of the House," arguing that "we have the smallest majority in US history" and that these are "not normal times."
- Senate Republicans plan to seize on the House discharge vehicle — which would extend the premium tax credits for three years — as a platform for a bipartisan bill that would then return to the House needing substantial Democratic support to pass.
- Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick signed Democrats’ discharge petition to force a vote on a clean three‑year ACA subsidy extension.
- Discharge petition remains three signatures short and cannot mature before the holiday recess (7 legislative‑day requirement).
- CBO estimates the GOP health bill would reduce the insured population by an average of 100,000 annually (2027–2035) while cutting average benchmark premiums by 11% and the deficit by $35.6B.
- Rules Committee prevented moderates’ subsidy-extension amendments from reaching the House floor.
- NPR reports the House has a vote scheduled Wednesday on Speaker Mike Johnson’s health-costs package that does not include an ACA subsidy extension.
- Rep. Mike Lawler publicly criticizes allowing the subsidies to lapse as 'idiotic' and 'unacceptable,' warning premiums will 'skyrocket.'
- Lawler says some House Republicans are pushing a temporary extension and seeking a bipartisan deal.
- NPR cites that more than 20 million people rely on the ACA subsidies.
- Speaker Mike Johnson said he will not hold a House vote this week on a bill to extend ACA (Obamacare) subsidies.
- Rep. Mike Lawler (R‑N.Y.) publicly criticized the decision on CBS News, calling it 'idiotic.'
+ 67 more sources