Topic: Education Policy
📊 Facts Database / Topics / Education Policy

Education Policy

20 Facts
23 Related Entities
As of 2025, Ohio became the 45th U.S. state to allow high school athletes to enter into name, image and likeness (NIL) agreements.
November 24, 2025 high temporal
State-level adoption status of NIL policies for high school athletes.
As of 2025, Alabama, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, and Wyoming were the U.S. states without a high school NIL framework in place.
November 24, 2025 high temporal
List of U.S. states that had not adopted high school NIL frameworks by late 2025.
The Ohio High School Athletic Association's 2025 NIL bylaw establishes reporting procedures and limitations designed to allow high school student-athletes to monetize their name, image and likeness while preserving athletic eligibility and complying with recruiting and amateurism bylaws.
November 24, 2025 high temporal
Description of the core components and purpose of a state high school athletic association NIL policy.
In recent years, some U.S. states have expanded statewide school voucher and scholarship initiatives, including Texas enacting a program valued at $1 billion.
November 21, 2025 high temporal
Trend of state-level expansion of voucher and scholarship programs and large-scale funding in some Republican-led states.
Tennessee's statewide voucher initiative for the 2025-26 school year authorizes up to 20,000 education vouchers of about $7,300 each.
November 21, 2025 high temporal
Program design specifying number of vouchers and approximate per-student voucher amount for a specified school year.
Under Tennessee's voucher law, private schools accepting vouchers are not required to administer the full Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program and may instead administer a national standardized test.
November 21, 2025 high temporal
Assessment requirements for private schools participating in the state's voucher program differ from public-school testing requirements.
Tennessee's voucher law includes a 'hold harmless' provision that provides additional state funding to school districts that experience student disenrollment to private schools through the voucher program.
November 21, 2025 high temporal
Fiscal mechanism intended to mitigate funding losses for public districts when students leave for private schools using vouchers.
The U.S. federal Title I program provides federal funding to elementary and secondary schools with large concentrations of low-income students.
November 19, 2025 high temporal
Description of the purpose of the federal Title I education program.
The U.S. Department of Education administers grant programs and oversight functions related to elementary and secondary education, higher education, Native American education, international education programs, child care grants, and panels that review foreign medical schools.
November 19, 2025 high temporal
General enumeration of types of grant programs and oversight roles historically handled by the federal Department of Education.
The U.S. Department of Education serves as a conduit for billions of dollars in federal aid that flow to state and local education agencies.
November 18, 2025 high structural
Describes the Department of Education's role in distributing federal education funding.
The U.S. federal student loan portfolio is approximately $1.6 trillion and is managed by the U.S. Department of Education.
November 18, 2025 high statistical
Size and management of the federal student loan portfolio.
The Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is a primary mechanism through which colleges and universities determine and provide financial aid packages to incoming students, and the U.S. Department of Education provides support for people completing the FAFSA.
November 18, 2025 high structural
Role of FAFSA in college financial aid and Department of Education support services.
Title I is a federal program that provides funding targeted to schools serving high concentrations of students from low-income families.
November 18, 2025 high structural
Purpose and targeting of Title I federal education funding.
The U.S. Department of Education's Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) designated four areas of national need for its FY2025 competitive grants program: promoting civil discourse, expanding the use of artificial intelligence, building capacity for high-quality short-term programs, and encouraging accreditation reform.
January 01, 2025 high policy
FIPSE is the Department of Education's grant program focused on postsecondary education improvements.
The Department of Education set seven priorities under the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) for the FY2025 competition to support the identified national needs.
January 01, 2025 high policy
These priorities are intended to guide FIPSE grant awards in FY2025.
FIPSE planned to distribute $60 million in grants under a single absolute priority for the FY2025 competition that includes promoting civil discourse on college and university campuses.
January 01, 2025 high statistic
The $60 million funding amount is allocated to grants tied to an absolute priority emphasizing civil discourse.
Eligible activities to promote civil discourse under the FIPSE FY2025 priority include seminars, speaker series, conferences, debates, and other learning opportunities that present a range of viewpoints and encourage dialogue on college and university campuses.
January 01, 2025 high policy
Examples of program activities that qualify for funding under the civil discourse priority.
Jefferson County Public Schools' policy states that students may be assigned overnight accommodations based on gender identity.
November 24, 2023 high temporal
Stated district policy concerning assignment of overnight housing for students.
The federal Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) establishes a parental right to inspect instructional materials used to instruct their children in schools.
high legal
PPRA is a federal statute that governs parental access to certain school instructional materials.
Title IX is invoked in legal disputes concerning the protection of women's sports and questions about the law's national enforcement.
high general
Use of federal education law in litigation over sports and enforcement scope