Entity: U.S. Courts of Appeals
📊 Facts Database / Entities / U.S. Courts of Appeals

U.S. Courts of Appeals

17 Facts
10 Related Topics
U.S. Courts of Appeals can temporarily suspend (stay) orders issued by lower federal courts while an appeal is pending.
October 29, 2025 high temporal
Appellate courts have authority to pause enforcement of district-court orders during appellate review.
U.S. federal courts of appeals have the procedural authority to stay or pause lower-court orders and to reconsider decisions issued by three-judge panels.
October 25, 2025 high procedural
Description of appellate-court procedural powers within the federal judiciary.
U.S. Courts of Appeals can issue emergency rulings or stays that suspend or modify district court orders and thereby affect whether state National Guard units remain under federal control pending appeal.
October 23, 2025 high legal
Appellate stays and emergency rulings are procedural remedies that can preserve or alter the effect of lower-court decisions while appeals are decided.
U.S. Courts of Appeals can review district court orders and issue rulings that stay, vacate, or modify those orders, including rulings that allow the federal government to retain control of National Guard troops while litigation continues.
October 22, 2025 high procedural
Describes the appellate review process for disputes over control and deployment of National Guard forces.
Appellate courts have the authority to stay lower-court orders or pause ongoing proceedings pending the outcome of an appeal.
October 22, 2025 high legal
Courts of appeals can issue stays to maintain the status quo while an appeal is resolved, which can keep facilities or activities operating despite a lower-court injunction until appellate review is complete.
U.S. Courts of Appeals can uphold or reverse district courts' temporary restraining orders that block or allow National Guard deployments.
October 21, 2025 high legal
Appellate review can change the legal status of lower-court orders affecting National Guard deployments.
U.S. Courts of Appeals can hear challenges to lower federal district court orders that grant release from immigration detention and may consider government appeals seeking to overturn those orders.
October 21, 2025 high legal
Describes appellate review of district court orders concerning immigration detention and release.
U.S. Courts of Appeals can stay, vacate, or reverse district court orders and thereby allow the federal government to retain control over National Guard troops during the pendency of appeals.
October 21, 2025 high legal
Appellate courts review and may alter lower-court injunctions or restraining orders, which can affect whether federal deployments proceed while cases are litigated.
U.S. federal courts, including U.S. Courts of Appeals, have authority to review and issue injunctions that can block or permit federal deployments of National Guard members within a state.
October 12, 2025 high legal
Judicial review can affect federal decisions to deploy National Guard personnel in states.
U.S. Courts of Appeals, including the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, can schedule and hear appeals in cases where lower courts have blocked federal deployments of National Guard troops.
October 09, 2025 high temporal
The article notes an appeals court scheduling arguments in an appeal of a lower-court ruling that blocked a Guard deployment.
U.S. Courts of Appeals can refuse requests to put a district court's order on hold (deny a stay), thereby leaving the lower court's order in effect pending further review.
October 07, 2025 high temporal
Describes appellate-court authority regarding stays of lower-court rulings.
U.S. Courts of Appeals can grant en banc review, a procedure in which the full appellate court bench votes on whether to rehear a case.
October 06, 2025 high procedural
En banc review is a standard appellate procedure available in U.S. federal courts.
U.S. district courts can issue temporary restraining orders that halt federal deployments of National Guard members.
September 28, 2025 high temporal
Federal courts have the authority to grant short-term injunctions or restraining orders affecting executive branch actions, including troop deployments.
Federal courts can issue injunctions that block enforcement of state laws, and U.S. Courts of Appeals can review and uphold or reverse those injunctions.
high procedural
In U.S. federal litigation, district courts may enjoin state laws pending legal challenges and appellate courts can decide whether to maintain those injunctions.
An en banc review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals is a procedure in which all the judges of the court hear and consider a case.
high procedural
Definition of an appellate court procedure used when a full court review is requested.
U.S. Courts of Appeals, including the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, commonly decide appeals using three-judge panels.
high procedural
Typical appellate procedure in federal circuit courts.
U.S. appellate and Supreme Court precedent holds that pretrial publicity, even when intense, does not automatically constitute a constitutional defect requiring dismissal of criminal charges.
high legal
This principle has been articulated in rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Courts of Appeals.